/b/ - Random

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (332.8KB, 1920x1798) Reverse

>ARRRE YOU READY 'TEENS?
<AYE AYE CAPTAIN
>I CANT HEAR YOOOOOOOU
<AYE AYE CAPTAIN
>OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH
>WHO USES A SHIT SITE RIGHT NEXT TO DISCORD HQ
<CUCKBOB JARTYPANTS
>BROWN AND FAT AND HALF OF A JEW
<CUCKBOB JARTYPANTS
>IF 'P AND COAL BE SOMETHING YOU WISH
<CUCKBOB JARTYPANTS
>THEN HOP ON THE JARTY AND CRY LIKE A BITCH
<CUCKBOB JARTYPANTS
>READY?
<CUCKBOB JARTYPANTS

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (498.6KB, 788x759) Reverse

>>>/meta/11823 (You)
>>>11820
>hard to say, different eras had different ups and downs, but my favorite was December of 2021. Though, everything up until soots absence and kuz taking over was pretty good.

>>>11822
>I would be more tolerant but after seeing what happened with the sharty, and how soylita niggers were a canary in the coal mine for oncoming CP spam, I have my doubts.

>pedo jokes are funny, but they stop being funny when it actually involves genuine pedos and grooming groups. These soylita posters come at the same time as we're getting embedded CP posts as well. Their intentions are not just to annoy or post a character they like, it's unfortunately more sinister.

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (411.6KB, 680x593) Reverse

>>>/meta/11819 (You)
>>>11802
>>Pretty much nobody cares about soylita besides people comfortable with pedophilic themes.
>caring about soylita is usually from the pedocord, but innocent posters do post images with her in passing. They don't particularly care for soylita, but actual quality posting users would be annoyed to see that they were banned for a variant that they happened to post in passing.

>>Or they'll start leaving for somewhere that allows this stuff like they did with the sharty and the shemmy.
>perhaps they would, but my goal isn't just to target "soylita posters" its to target people who sexualize or obsess over children in any way, shape, or form. Their posts are from nigger hell and make using the site unfun. jakparty.soy should be a fun place to post soyjaks, soyquotes, nasquotes, and other /qa/ related content.

>>>11807
>>the jarty being better than sharty is when the pedocord reigns supreme
>i don't know what nucaca hell you crawled out of, but soot's sharty did not have an obnoxious pedo problem until he took time away from th

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (47KB, 680x897) Reverse

>>>/meta/11788 (You)
>>>11782
>If I do end up going down the same route as the sharty with a straight ban on soylita content, I think it may do harm to innocent posters as well and be too restrictive (some users use this variant in passing and I do not want to over-moderate them) and ineffective at the same time (as pedos will just find a new symbol to attach to to signal to each other on the site and drive post quality down). 

>I would like to more specifically tackle the core of the issue if I did implement a rule: any content that involves children in any way should be removed, since we have had issues here before with people posting images of little girls in bikinis as "jokes". These pedo types will just find a new symbol to use to express their illness. I'm sure that the current spur on of users is some 'cord psyop given how all the coal in the world is coming on at once because of it.

>>>11784
>You may be right, but im trying to avoid any hard-line blanket bans on types of content that would be on topic (soylita, while NAS, is involved in many acceptable soyjak edits that are otherwise acceptable for the site).

>I want

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (144.5KB, 593x797) Reverse

>>>/meta/11778 (You)
>why are soylita posters the niggers of the jarty?
>>come to site with anti-loli rule
>>spam loli porn
>>get banned
>>chimp out about it
>>claim to be "muh oldjart kultur"
>>proceed to throw tantrums on /meta/ about how being a pedophile is ebin "bait"
>>randomly at the same time as this is happening, afterparty memes, onegzellig spam, wignat shit, threads with embedded CP, and pedophile generals start cropping up

>im starting to think that we're the target of some kind of raid

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (85.9KB, 888x849) Reverse

>>>/meta/12054 (You)
>>LUTE ADD /LOLI/
>>LUTE, ADD /LOLI/ SO WE CAN SPAM CP AND LOLI PORN
><[PEDOCORD MANDATED GOONING SPACE]
>>THIS IS VERY GOOD AND IS VERY MUCH SHARTY AND JARTY CULTURE. SOOT WAS A BASED ARYAN PEDOPHILE AS WELL
><[PEDOCORD MANDATED GOONING SPACE]
>>EVERYONE KNOWS THAT BEING A PEDOPHILE IS LE JARTY CULTURE AND THAT WE SPLINTERED FROM KUZ BECAUSE HE BANNED PEDOPHILLIA
><[PEDOCORD MANDATED GOONING SPACE]
>>lF YOU ARGUE THAT IM WRONG, YOU'RE JUST A PROJECTING PEDOPHILE TOO
><[PEDOCORD MANDATED GOONING SPACE]
>>ALSO MANDATE SOYLITA AS THE ICON OF THE SITE GEEEEEEG KEEEK GEEEEG GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEG GEEEEEEEEEEEE-
><[General practitioner mandated social distancing space]
><[General practitioner mandated social distancing space]
><[General practitioner mandated social distancing space]
>>im sorry 'teen, but it looks like this individual has succumbed to the effects of Cobshit-23

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (53.2KB, 761x855) Reverse

>>>/meta/12274 (You)
>>SOOTISM IS WHEN I GET TO SPAM LOLI PORN EVERYWHERE
>>NO SOOTISM IS WHEN YOU GET INVOLVED IN DISCORD DRAMA AND DRAW YAOI

1720919937065e.mp4
[Hide] (22.4MB, 1280x720, 02:50)

>>>/meta/12386 (You)
>>>12119
>>since when did i say that schizo admins
>since you went on tirades against anything anthro.

>>i dont even get turned on to disney dogs 
>meds, no one mentioned this.
>why do you have to deny something no one even mentioned. do you get turned on my disney dogs?

>>if you truly care about forgiveness can you just help me make a self hosted jschan instance step by step on this fixed computer pic rel why cant i just code jack shit properly?
>https://gitgud.io/fatchan/jschan/-/blob/master/INSTALLATION.md?ref_type=heads

>you can create your own board if you're too retarded to create a jschan instance as well.

>>he even enabled the name field just to make fun of me that one time

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (214.6KB, 680x897) Reverse

>>>/meta/12094 (You)
>>>12093
>again, soylita as a variant is not banned, I am merely cracking down on the pedo posts due to them being a problem on the site. 

>Pedos have been a massive problem for the soysphere as a whole, being the owners of discords that unfairly influence site culture, being the people involved in much of the mean spirited raid culture that ruined the sharty, being the people who outright spammed CP and tried to take both this and sister sites down multiple times, and they've even infiltrated moderation (the Red incident with doll) to promote their discord servers. Pedo posters, of all the sexual deviants, have somehow proven themselves to be the absolute worst posters on the site and their infiltration here is not something i'm going to let happen. Sorry to the more innocent posters who just like a variant and want to post bait, but the lack of self-policing is a large problem. Say what you will about the coomer furries and fetishists here, but they've have never done shit as bad as what the pedoniggers have done to the soymunity.
>>>/meta/12094 (You)
>>>12093
>again, soyli

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (440.6KB, 1375x2392) Reverse

>>>/meta/12052 (You)
>>>12045
>>super large cocks, extra gaped assholes or other unrealistic examples can we post lolis too?
>no because its still loli coal.

>>>12046
>>damn okay that's epic
>thought it might be fun to let /qa/ turn into niggerhell sfw/random because its currently useless (and maybe, just maybe, it will end up being funny and I will have to kneel to the nameGODS)

>>>12050
>just keep it on the kway and its kosher.

>>>12051
>no meme arrow therefore you are a BBC loving cobson