>the "international community" was completely OK with Hitler
Continuing on this point. It's obvious to see the contrast with true revolutionary states, wherein one class overthrows the other. How they were treated by the international community. The White army was sent ample supplies, volunteers and diplomatic support. Even decades after victory, the USSR was denied formal recognition and diplomatic ties. In contrast, Hitler was given the Rhineland, Austria, Czechia and was allowed to rebuild it's armies.
>B-but he went to war against the allies, this proves he was against the system!
There is no shadowy cabal of bourgeoisie. Their class interests often align, but they also diverge. For example, one bourgeoisie may support protectionism because his business would struggle to compete against foreign prices, while a financier capitalist of the same country would support the lessening of tariffs and so on. While they both support the general idea of Capitalism and private property rights. Similarly, the capitalist class of Germany benefited from the slave labor and plundered wealth of conquered nations. Cuba is still today embargoed and a pariah. Due to American law that bans vessels that had traded with Cuba in the past 180 days from docking at US ports and prevents foreign subsidiaries of American companies from doing business in Cuba. Along with sanctions imposed on overseas businesses that trade with Cuba. In contrast, Pinochet was an American dog. That owed his rule to a US backed coup and millions of American dollars spent interfering in Chilean politics.