>so being a pedonigger is allowed? as expected of j@rtycvcks
there's no guaranteed way to just "ban pedos" from your site without it devolving into schizophrenic accusations and purity spiraling over what exactly counts as "pedophillia". This should be a subject relegated to law enforcement agencies, not soyjak websites.
So long as the posts themselves aren't disruptive, they're going to be permitted for the same reason that pro-nazi, pro-racist, or pro-violence statements will be permitted.
>borderline nsfw
its just a dusty edit of a meme with soylita.
>fine i'll just make 1 mutt thread every few days and necrobump them all once a month since that isnt against the rules
that's not against the rules, yes, ideally though it'd be "one topic, one thread". I'm not going to enforce that for its unpopularity, but a mutt general would be most ideal as to not take up catalog space.
>im gonna assume we can spam derail threads since multiple threads had this and nothing happend to those
this behavior is expressly permitted:
"5. Dumping images in single threads"
the posts themselves don't crash browsers or anything either. If you don't like it, filter it in your settings.