>>11791
>Don’t you think that the pony porn will also bring in more degenerates too? Lute do you plan on banning sexual images of animals soon?
I have considered a sfw /soy/ before, but decided against it for its restrictiveness. I have removed /b/ for the types of coalers it attracted before as well. If there ends up being a problem with porn generals on /soy/ harming the site's quality, I will remove them so this place doesn't become 4cuck's /b/.
The pony porn faggots have honestly been more well behaved than the soylita niggers. instead of avatarfagging, posting loli porn, and screeching this is a "HEGGIN SOYLITA PEDOPHILE SITE", they keep to their own thread and don't spread too much. It's coal, but manageable coal. If they ever end up being a problem though, I will take action.
>I think there is at least a few ‘lita lewds still up.
please report them when you see them
>I don’t understand how you expect Lute to cater to you in his own website just because “erm you are le moralcvck…that’s normie and kinda not /liberty/….wtf are you my parents?”. There is plenty of lolicon imageboards so I just don’t understand how lolicons want to come here. It just feels like they want to be disruptive of purpose.
tsmt. cobGOD trvthnvke right here. lolifags have places to be: 8ch.moe exists. If they want to post sexualized images of cartoon children and be obnoxious about it they can do it somewhere else on a place I'm not paying for. they can scream "MUH 'LITA WEBSITE AND OLDJART CULTUR" on hardware that they pay for, or are permitted to use. I try to keep things lax because it allows people to have fun here, but when the posting becomes disruptive it needs to go.
Ideally everyone would be connecting peer-to-peer, paying for whatever they host themselves, but that is not our current situation. Peerchan unfortunately is not ready for full deployment.
>>11792
that's only for sfw boards if the nsfw image is on-topic. /soy/ is nsfw.
>>11796
>10% of men in survey will admit they have sexual thoughts about kids
even if that's true, I doubt it is since "kids" means those who are pre-pubecent, I don't understand why that means that a soyjak website needs to be covered in loli shit. you have other boards you can post on.
>>11810
>Because allowing what other soyjak sites don't is what makes jarty special.
If that was the only thing that would make the jarty special, then 4cuck's /b/ would be the best place for 'jakkers because of its lack of quality control and rules. That place is abandoned and just exists as gooner hell these days.
The jarty is primarily carried by its OC producers and witty anonymous users, users whom enjoy a slower site that's more lax on content and rules, yes, but also don't want this place to devolve into catty wiping porn spam and gore like 4chan's /b/ (or the sharty was before the ban on the awful "dead nigger baby" """meme"""). I'm sure that many of the users here are unhappy with booru.soy's namefag culture (I know I dislike it), which has taken comedy away from the content itself and instead put it towards fake e-drama between people who you shouldn't care about.
I try to keep the catalog fair to compete for posts on and free of heart-wrenching and disgusting content so these users come back and enjoy themselves when posting. This manifests itself in me removing CP/Gore/loli shit, consolidating threads, and banning people trying to make a name for themselves that aren't contributing OC in any way. That's the rationale behind the rules. If you're not fond of my methods of making the site a fun and fruitful place to participate in, please tell me what I'm doing wrong, but if you don't like the concept as a whole then you're probably better off on a different site where spamming the latest pedophillic discord coal about some namefag would be more welcome, maybe discord would be more your speed?