/coal/ - coal

slopjak dumping ground

Well everyone, it's finally over. After YEARS of posting on bald cartoon men with glasses website, our time here has finally come to an end. For better or worse, this is how it has to be. I have to give my sincerest thanks to everyone who has contributed to this site's success, everyone from the slopjak shitposters to the genuine effort posting users who have tried to make this place fun to use.

All of you have etched out a name for the jarty as something worth remembering. I hope you all had as much fun as I did, because the memories I made here are something I hope to have the privilege of being able to take to my grave. Thank you all for the good times and good laughs. I love you all and, at least as it pertains to this site, this is goodbye.

Some time soon I will be putting up a static page in honor of the site and with an archive of old posts.

If you need me, you can reach me on XMPP at https://invite.joinjabber.org/#lute@xmpp.party
or at least for the next month: admin@jakparty.soy.

Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] | [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]

Chud 16/09/2024, 08:31:37 No.246 [Open]

fff1381425ae5b7f6ec14aaf96245c0ecdb6748c65e62fcd1e7dce875700e0cd.png
[Hide] (548KB, 460x460) Reverse

>>>/meta/11685
>I'm not interested in going around in circles in this thread anymore. If you want to change the avatarfag rule, then make a thread requesting for its change and give good reasoning for it. Just insulting the site on /meta/ is the same shit the cobson laughing (also known as fatcat/MarMar, a /qa/fe pedophile) spammer did. It's unproductive and does not belong on /meta/: a serious board related to site quality.

>If you actually care about the state of the site and believe the rule goes too far or its enforcement has been too harsh, then make an earnest thread about it. This concern trolling is not helpful. Until a rule change goes in, I will continue enforcing the rules as is, meaning that soylita avatarfagging is not protected and will get you banned as does every other type of avatarfagging.

Chud 16/09/2024, 07:04:56 No.244 [Open]

f5605d9d14c8c7c6e09c89530c52319f5fd0a6f32b9e7e7c258afb8ebb04b34f.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1920x1798) Reverse

>Date	User	Actions	Links	Log Message
>21 minutes ago	jewswon	Move	>>162988	-
>22 minutes ago	jewswon	Move	>>162987	-
>23 minutes ago	jewswon	Move	>>162986	-
>25 minutes ago	jewswon	Move	>>162985	-
>28 minutes ago	jewswon	Move	>>162984	-
>30 minutes ago	jewswon	Move	>>162983	-
>40 minutes ago	jewswon	Move	>>162981	-
>42 minutes ago	jewswon	Move	>>162980	-
>56 minutes ago	jewswon	Move	>>162979	-
>1 hour ago	jewswon	Move	>>162977	-
>1 hour ago	jewswon	Move	>>162974	-
>1 hour ago	jewswon	Move	>>162973	-
>1 hour ago	jewswon	Move	>>162971	-
>1 hour ago	jewswon	Move	>>162970	-

Message too long. View the full text

Chud 16/09/2024, 06:42:36 No.243 [Open]

396246c7d801155b292b9ab2392b0035cc34a413a3f6150b920744a5fdeafa86.png
[Hide] (253.3KB, 1079x1725) Reverse

>>>/comtech/804 
<>>803
<>what kind of exploit are the CSAMMERs using that they werent before? site was free of 'p for 4 days but now theyre able to spam for some reason
<as I anticipated, they're not using tor IPs, as all of those are disallowed from uploading images. 
<They're likely circumventing this by using some VPN network, or various harvested proxies. 
<>will this affect lute's one week testing period and cause him to give up
<I do not want to give up, this situation is recoverable. 
<There are still things to be done to combat these "people", not every card has been played yet.

Chud 16/09/2024, 06:41:58 No.242 [Open]

0419911c4b395f6b1e69cb6c3a5053d922112b9779c6d3ffafb924eaabc65b61.png
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1920x1798) Reverse

>>>/comtech/804 
>>>803
>>what kind of exploit are the CSAMMERs using that they werent before? site was free of 'p for 4 days but now theyre able to spam for some reason
>as I anticipated, they're not using tor IPs, as all of those are disallowed from uploading images. 
>They're likely circumventing this by using some VPN network, or various harvested proxies. 
>>will this affect lute's one week testing period and cause him to give up
>I do not want to give up, this situation is recoverable. 
>There are still things to be done to combat these "people", not every card has been played yet.

Chud 16/09/2024, 06:40:32 No.241 [Open]

ec1d52b096983d117267e0183fae05398c42bb19dcd29e4b946057af59376f1a.png
[Hide] (225.3KB, 1100x790) Reverse

>>>/comtech/804 
<>>803
<>what kind of exploit are the CSAMMERs using that they werent before? site was free of 'p for 4 days but now theyre able to spam for some reason
<as I anticipated, they're not using tor IPs, as all of those are disallowed from uploading images. 
<They're likely circumventing this by using some VPN network, or various harvested proxies. 
<>will this affect lute's one week testing period and cause him to give up
<I do not want to give up, this situation is recoverable. 
<There are still things to be done to combat these "people", not every card has been played yet.

Chud 16/09/2024, 06:38:32 No.240 [Open]

cc8dfc9cae1e7b52c926a17bbba15e305feaca33e8caee6bb880472251ba98b9.png
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1125x1387) Reverse

>>>/comtech/804 
>>>803
>>what kind of exploit are the CSAMMERs using that they werent before? site was free of 'p for 4 days but now theyre able to spam for some reason
>as I anticipated, they're not using tor IPs, as all of those are disallowed from uploading images. 
>They're likely circumventing this by using some VPN network, or various harvested proxies. 
>>will this affect lute's one week testing period and cause him to give up
>I do not want to give up, this situation is recoverable. 
>There are still things to be done to combat these "people", not every card has been played yet.

Chud 16/09/2024, 06:35:24 No.239 [Open]

85cdedfc9ff84d62a72369757e43ac60cd438bdc62a09f02aea1c3c4661315fd.png
[Hide] (2.4MB, 1920x1798) Reverse

>>>/comtech/804 
<>>803
<>what kind of exploit are the CSAMMERs using that they werent before? site was free of 'p for 4 days but now theyre able to spam for some reason
<as I anticipated, they're not using tor IPs, as all of those are disallowed from uploading images. 
<They're likely circumventing this by using some VPN network, or various harvested proxies. 
<>will this affect lute's one week testing period and cause him to give up
<I do not want to give up, this situation is recoverable. 
<There are still things to be done to combat these "people", not every card has been played yet.

Chud 16/09/2024, 06:33:44 No.238 [Open]

8cd73101a222fc1deff613e0e9f45c6ac4c75310c1ff47b19fd42d70a851c01a.png
[Hide] (546.4KB, 1319x2065) Reverse

>>>/comtech/804 
>>>803
>>what kind of exploit are the CSAMMERs using that they werent before? site was free of 'p for 4 days but now theyre able to spam for some reason
>as I anticipated, they're not using tor IPs, as all of those are disallowed from uploading images. 
>They're likely circumventing this by using some VPN network, or various harvested proxies. 
>>will this affect lute's one week testing period and cause him to give up
>I do not want to give up, this situation is recoverable. 
>There are still things to be done to combat these "people", not every card has been played yet.

Chud 16/09/2024, 06:24:04 No.237 [Open]

49f3c5f832b7963c2d1d988ea16f6565e1090c4baacfe7e54b28c18259ea3ba2.png
[Hide] (333.9KB, 1024x1024) Reverse

>>68534
>so the baby bot has been revealed to be a (possibly) bad actor

>and he or someone is spamming jarty ads on soyjak.in and soyjak.in ads on the jarty

>>68535 
>i'm owner of babybot
>that wasn't me on the jarty or shinny

>>68538
>>>68535
>Proof you are the babbybot's creator?

>>68540 
>>>68535

Message too long. View the full text

Chud 16/09/2024, 06:21:51 No.236 [Open]

5665a9848b9fcbf97423d4c0e8b8b1c00aa98a86d89171df5f4db2f60847bd96.png
[Hide] (251.2KB, 2000x2000) Reverse

>>68534
>so the baby bot has been revealed to be a (possibly) bad actor

>and he or someone is spamming jarty ads on soyjak.in and soyjak.in ads on the jarty

>>68535 
>i'm owner of babybot
>that wasn't me on the jarty or shinny

>>68538
>>>68535
>Proof you are the babbybot's creator?

>>68540 
>>>68535

Message too long. View the full text

Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] | [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]

/coal/ - coal

slopjak dumping ground

Actions:

Captcha: