>>9887
>they showed ongezellig girls sexually. the girls are in high school. why is that not pedo shit
the characters aren't drawn in a way to mimic prepubescent children, thus, I tolerate it. Any character, no matter their "canon" age (which doesn't matter at all, since it's a fucking drawing and can be set to anything), if drawn in a way that's pre-pubecent would violate the rule. Content of character's that's depicting a post-pubecent character, doesn't violate the rule. Fictional character's don't have real ages, since they're not real, it's about the content they depict, and if it's of a pre-pubecent character or not.
>>9891
>safe from degeneracy
what kind of high-horse are you on? this is a soyjak forum and it was posted on /b/, a literal dumping ground for garbage content. it's not like you went to some "LE BASED FASHLARP SAVING THE WHITE RACE" board, you went to a bald cartoon man with glasses website's trash-can.
The post you reported, while nas brimstone coal from the depths of hell itself, isn't rule violating. that doesn't mean that it needs to be removed by a moderator. You can personally just hide the post if you dislike it. If you dislike this kind of content so much, then I would suggest filtering it on your machine with an extension, I suggest this FOSS one: