>>10009
>you could say this in the year 2005
I said it now as well. you can make any argument at any time. rather it's $currentyear or not doesn't matter.
>children are all over the internet
children are not welcome here
making rules around children makes no sense at all because of this.
Not permitting children here is all I need to do, I've done my due diligence. I don't understand why it's expected of me, a faceless webhost, to babysit the children of others. That's the problem of the these children's parents, not of me.
>i dont see the advantage of allowing someone who explicitly expresses his desire to possess children sexually
Direct quotation of people doing this, satirical parody of people who do (i.e, making fun of the sharty's administration for attracting children and being pedos), and low-brow shock humor (in the same way that typing something racist like "rape all niggers" is permitted).
In the same way that violent, racist content is permitted because it's not actually doing the real things (i.e, killing minorities), pedo jokes are permitted because it's not the actual thing. If it ever gets to the point of being the real thing (such as organizing grooming a child on the website), i'll gladly remove the content under the guise of rule 0.