>>11688
>Define this.
if someone is using it as a way of identifying themselves, then it counts. I.e,
if you consistently sign most of your posts with a specific image that no one before posted, then you're avatarfagging. This is especially the case when you're not using it to make fun of someone and you're just self-inserting.
>i just reported all the avatarfags by your rules on /soy/
no you didn't:
6. Rules are enforced by intent, not letter, therefore loopholes in the rules are disallowed.
my intent for this rule is to prevent people from creating an identity, most of the people you've posted are actually soyquoting (or at least nasquoting) people with their image. They're not just posting their opinion with an obnoxious avatar as a way of identifying themselves.
Many of the users you did post are shemmy immigrants, and im sure that some of those really are avatars, but they haven't been on the site enough for me to confirm them as such. If they keep posting, they'll be removed.
>if some one wants to post nothing but neutralplier on your site it's their right to do it
no it's not. I own this place and pay for the servers. If you want to have that then contribute to peerchan so you can do it on your own computer while still networking with other 'teens. I want us to get to that point so the janny problem can permanently be solved.