/meta/ - Meta

Jarty-killing Cuckfag falseflag Thread, YWNBAW

Jarty-saving Bvllcis truthnuke Thread, YWABAW

what browser are you using? I'm not able to reproduce this problem on my machine.

>>10567
PoW captcha isn't something I would rule out, but I think it's better as a one-time thing akin to kiwifarm's kiwiflare to stop DoS attacks. A captcha, hopefully, ensures that a human and not a bot posts; a PoW captcha just adds a computing requirement to the site (only useful for baby bot tier excessive spam).

>>10571
>what browser are you using? I'm not able to reproduce this problem on my machine.

I Use Google chrome and Opera browser on my ipad

>PoW captcha isn't something I would rule out, but I think it's better as a one-time thing akin to kiwifarm's kiwiflare to stop DoS attacks. A captcha, hopefully, ensures that a human and not a bot posts; a PoW captcha just adds a computing requirement to the site (only useful for baby bot tier excessive spam).

I think, better use kiwiflare rather captcha, captcha can get error and it annoy me, i can't post important thread

>>10574
>I Use Google chrome and Opera browser on my ipad
I don't have an iPad to test this with, nor do I have google chrome or opera. can someone test these out to see if they can reproduce the problem on their mobile devices?

also it should go without saying, but for those who don't know: you shouldn't be using proprietary software such as google chrome or restrictive hardware such as the iPad.

>>>>10575>>10575>>10575>>10575>>10575>>10575

KUUUUUUTE WHERE IS THE TRUMPFLARE ITS FOSS AND IT HAS ANTI GLOBOHOMO ELEMENTS YOU SHOULD ADD IT

>>10571
Can you just change type of CAPTCHA? I think other type of CAPTCHA Does not have error like that

>nobody can tell if the anti-cp system is still being worked on.
Erm I hsven't seen any 'p breads doe.  Checked btw, other than that it's kinda trve

64.JPG
[Hide] (211.5KB, 1024x1024) Reverse

>hsven't

FOR_KOLECHIA.png
[Hide] (3.8MB, 2250x2100) Reverse

>I transheart weird gatekeeping

>>10557
the automatic anti-cp system has been stalled in development unfortunately. I have other priorities on other projects, and jakparty.soy has been low priority because of it. If the soypocalypse really did make the site one of the big contenders for the new home of 'jakking, I would have put more focus in it (due to higher PPH), but for now, the CP reporting system I built and moderator action is sufficient to keep the site safe.

dc3a810943c1dd5de4f056cc37ea86ddef4f0294ca027db54e72603b9ba694d8.png
[Hide] (7.5KB, 229x220) Reverse

>but for now, the CP reporting system I built and moderator action is sufficient to keep the site safe.

Angeleno ## Admin
Done

>>10541 (OP) 
do this

I think a feature like this would be useful, but of low development priority since it's not integral to the site's functionality.
If you would like to add it anyway, I would suggest implementing it in JSChan itself on their git page.

have all your posts archived btw, maybe the next step should be contacting the domain registrar, hosting provider, and all their peers.
https://archive.ph/eX0cV

>someone posted cp
>j*rtyCVCKS are pedos because someone posted cp on xheir site
are you willing to apply the same logic to sh*rtySHITS? if not gtfo

a3a118e7ea0c09050cd3487e4926a2293f29fa6c12f7be4deefdaf15cde7a989.png
[Hide] (53.5KB, 938x626) Reverse

>>someone posted cp
>>j*rtyCVCKS are pedos because someone posted cp on xheir site
>are you willing to apply the same logic to sh*rtySHITS? if not gtfo

9ca3a2e2be5c5b55cdbea0606542639667f56655928b164fdd6a7ea0bf656ac2.png
[Hide] (2.7KB, 88x52) Reverse

>>10549 (OP) 
its in the reply message thing

>>10550
thanks chudcel

you’re obnoxiously new

cryboy.png
[Hide] (43.4KB, 466x593) Reverse

>you’re obnoxiously new even doe I didn’t notice that until now

gem

>>10538 (OP) 
i thought it was the bot 
you are unbanned now

>>10539
another altoids win
lifesavercels and mentoscucks on suicide watch

>>9814
probably the creator larping as a j*rtycuck and promoting her cringe shit or something along those lines

up

sometimes the "avatarfag" rule seems to be just an excuse to remove anything that doesn't participate in the site's "theme"/ that you personally dislike.

the no namefagging & avatarfagging rule wasn't added until kolyma took over the site so i don't really see the reason why jarty has it.

also @admin should ban doxxing or just delete /sharty/, it adds nothing to the site.

9866a6591df528d87b08f39543dbb72177cfe302abddd7aaeef56b0a9b03c94a.png
[Hide] (4.2KB, 400x400) Reverse

5de12ba275bb4a8889e4bdc0c68eda8d042143a424f8d4b559ce5ed7483a280c.png
[Hide] (44.5KB, 602x752) Reverse

>Staff complaint/feedback thread
>A lot of new staff members have recently been added to the site. Post in this thread to cry criticize some of our newest members that you think have been unfair. Or you can just sperg about stratogem like you always do.

>I noticed a certain new janny giving people absurd bans for posting /sharty/ threads on /soy/. When I asked Lute about it he told me that no one else emailed him about this. Since you selfish little discord fucks don't feel like writing emails, you can bitch here instead.