First of all, what's jarty's purpose?
Recruiting oldfags to continue how /soy/ actually looked like before kuz ruined the site with his discord friends, right? Since you use soy-tan as your site's mascot because kuz took her down and that's supposed to be a sign of continuation.
What was allowed on /soy/ before kuz?
As an 2021 sharty midfag myself, I'm pretty sure spamming catalog with one variant, avatarfagging as tranime characters, pedo baiting, saging threads with dotspam were all allowed but let's just say you banned these out of pure "quality control" purpose.
What wasn't allowed on /soy/ before kuz?
Soot would NOT tolerate soytan rape porn, soytan diaper porn, yaoi gay porn, mlp porn dump on /soy/, soot's jannies would delete or move those shit to /b/. BUT you did. Why? Because off-topic content on /soy/ is allowed as long as it's not excessive spam and /soy/ is a nsfw board, right? That's good, you almost made your /soy/ more free than soot's /soy/. And let's just say that you consider IAS pornography quality content, you know what kind of IAS porn was explicitly tolerated on /soy/? jak'n'fap loli edits and soylita nsfw because they're both IAS and OC. And let's say if soot still runs the sharty and somehow decides to delete /nate/ and allow mlp porn on /soy/ like you did, sfw tranime lolis and liveleak gore videos would be least of his concerns since they're not nearly as shocking as zoophilia by an average 4chan user's standards, and tranime lolis are /qa/ culture too. Sharty is a splinter of 4chan after all.
>but muh pedo problem
Nobody back then gave a fuck about prepubescent looking fictional characters because they are just fucking drawings, and if you can reply with mlp porn >>>/soy/143758 and literal gay scat >>>/soy/147887 on /soy/ without getting banned, you should be able to bait with suggestive lolis as well, because that's just how old sharty used to be.
>but muh groomercord
The groomercord in question is currently running sharty and soyjak.blog, which both banned soylita and pedo baiting.