>>11828
>"You're not allowed to cover page 1 with anti-jarty memes by necrobumping" was never addressed in your "excessive spam" rule, and you're doing it mainly because you didn't like it.
because what's excessive isn't defined, which is something I want to do in that thread but haven't gotten around to finalizing and updating the rules with.
>slopjak spammers might produced more actual ias oc than jarty users did since they started spamming.
they do produce OC sometimes and what they do is in the spirit of what the jarty is about, but their overbearing presence on the catalog can be a problem on occasion (in the same way that someone spamming any one jak on the 'log would be). So I try to consolidate them.
the ai parodies are some of the funniest stuff to come out of the sharty/jarty in awhile btw.
>That's what I've been trying to tell you, you are selectively deciding what kind of threads are "quality posts", what are allowed to be necrobumped based on your own preferences.
again, it's not necrobumping thats the problem, its taking up a large amount of space on the limited sized catalog.
and I don't believe I ever said that this place would be any kind of judgement free website to post whatever you want, its a soyjak website about soyquotes. These things will get special treatment in comparison to nas spam. I think the j*rtycvck memes are closer in line with the sites point, so I go light on them when they start catty wiping, but catty wiping is still catty wiping.
>No please go away just let people do whatever they want if users (you) actually cared about certain threads being burried by slopjaks they would've bumped them back.
if users alone were capable of managing the site without any moderation, then 4cuck's /b/ and the nusharty during its admin inactive eras would be good places to post. Unfortunately, this isn't the case and the janny, despite the hate for them, is a necessary evil. Ideally we'd be on peerchan and choosing our own jannies, but peerchan isn't ready.