Soylita is now globally banned under rule 1.
>come to site with anti-loli rule >spam loli porn >get banned >chimp out about it >claim to be "muh oldjart kultur" >proceed to throw tantrums on /meta/ about how being a pedophile is ebin "bait" >randomly at the same time as this is happening, afterparty memes, onegzellig spam, wignat shit, threads with embedded CP, and pedophile generals start cropping up im starting to think that we're the target of some kind of raid
>>11819 lita posters are all refugees from the sharty i wouldnt blame you if you just put a temporary 3 month period where you send all lita posts to >>>/sharty/ to keep the loggy free of crap you have a good enough track record of not rulescucking to enact a short temporary measure
>>11904 I'm heavily considering this. inb4 pedoseethe in replies
>>12002 wow and i thought stratogem was bad akso check your mail again
soylita was banned and unbanned from all the websites before. they only do it when they get desperate for users.
>>12002 Do it faggot. You talk a big game but dont do shit. Ban 'lita and plunge this shithole into obscurity.
>I would warn though that if a woman unfortunately does look underage, source for their age should be posted so moderators are aware and can confirm "this is an adult" Holy shit this is one of the most cucked things ive ever read on the internet. lmao Kill Yourself
new secret feature that allows you to get rid of lita/bait threads
new secret feature that allows you to post 'lita without the risk of getting deleted https://8chan.moe/soy/
>>11984 gem l*te btfo
@SOOR Fire the inactive janny that randomly comes back online, removing rule abiding 'lita posts (according to YOU), and then leaving so they can goon to animation memes.
>jakparty dot soy slash soy slash catalog dot html >Actual soyjak threads get less than a dozen replies >The MLP bait thread gets 400 replies and the soylita pedo thread gets almost 250 replies This is how a site that's been compromised looks. @soot Is it really over or is there something we can do to stop this?
yo mama
LOOT BRING OLD SHARTY BACK IT WAS SOMETHING LIKE THIS https://archive.is/yHDUy
@admin now that you've finally witnessed how free the old sharty was, your chance has come. unban gore and loli, unban avatars and spam, enable name field, reinstate /b/, do not give a single fuck about what the shartytrannies think of your site. become the arch nemesis of all nusoicucks, or being remembered as the furry obsession site as it is.
>>11909 SOOT DO THS
>>11909 big things coming. trust the plan. WLGOWGA
I am old.
>I am old.
It seems that the site's quality has gone down rather sharply recently. BBC porn, O9A seigetard larp shit, and porn spam seem to be going on on /b/. /sharty/ went from discussing the old site to just faildox garbage I'd expect from soyjak.party. /soy/ is a lot less lively as well. Are there any people from the soot/early kuz era of soyjak.party even left posting on this site? If so, please speak up.
w7-890 on legion here not trying to bump but why was this post deleted?
>>10766 (OP) If you're actually craving for oldfags to post on this site then you must try to compromise with the old sharty/4chan rules >>11906 , currently it's just a more rulescucked sharty with exceptions that is soylita and pedophilia advocacy content.
I am here, but I do not feel like posting, but I probably have ADHD which is the reason why I browse this site.
>Acktually the old sharty used to be everything I like and nothing I dont like
>>10823 well, he really did evolve into another rulecucked shitmin
>posting sexy lolis (as .png) <posting sexy lolis (as links to offsite sources)
There is currently a loli thread that has stayed up for hours. It should be against rule one. The thread has pictures of lolis wearing bikinis with suggestive poses clearly meant to be goon material but maybe you don’t find it to be lewd enough to ban it. Or maybe you weren’t made aware of the thread. I just want to know what are the limits for a lolicon thread to get banned? Btw I’m not a lolicon. I find them annoying but I just hide the thread. I’m just a concerned jartycvck soy citizen.
>>11872 How has your testing of the peerchan/gladden gone?
do this lute
>>11889 do this instead
>What is allowed here? >Do not post
>>11841 KEEP IN MIND THAT LOGAN COOPER IS A SHITCORD KIKE WHO KILLED SHARTY FOREVER AND NEVER APOLOGIZED FOR THE CP ACCUSATIONS ON JARTY!! YOU ARE TALKING TO SOMEONE WHO PROBABLY DOESN'T EVEN LIKE SOYJAKS
this is so much better than the shartycuck website i am proud to be a jartybull today. you have the best moderation decisions thank you so much for still running this wonderful website.
>>11911 (OP) >>11912 thank you, lute and all liberty loving jarters